Project Overview
This project explores the challenge of optimizing NFL team rosters using Madden ratings and salaries, revealing the complex trade-offs between player quality, scheme fit, and salary cap constraints.
Key Insights
- There's no single definition of "best" roster - optimization requires balancing competing factors
- Scheme fit dramatically influences optimal player selections and team composition
- Evolutionary algorithms provide flexible solutions to multi-constraint optimization problems
- Qualitative roster preferences can be mathematically encoded through penalty and bonus weights
I set out to determine the "best" possible NFL roster under salary cap constraints using Madden player ratings. I quickly discovered that there's no mathematically optimal solution when accounting for position-specific needs and scheme considerations.
To address this complexity, I leveraged Excel's evolutionary solver, which allows for weighted optimization with customizable bonuses and penalties. This approach enabled me to explore questions like whether to prioritize a few elite players or build deeper roster depth, and how to balance competing needs across different positions.
The incorporation of Madden's "scheme" definitions added another dimension to the optimization. By utilizing player ratings in individual skill categories and archetypes, I could create specialized lineups tailored to different offensive and defensive philosophies.
Optimization Approach
After organizing the player data and setting up scheme-specific worksheets, I implemented a comprehensive system of penalties and bonuses to guide the evolutionary solver:
Penalties
- Hard Constraints: Severe penalties for exceeding salary cap or position limits
- Age Balance: Penalties for excessively high roster average age
- Low Ratings: Discouragement for selecting unrealistically poor players
- Scheme Mismatch: Penalties for players poorly suited to the chosen scheme
Bonuses
- Elite Talent: Bonuses for exceptionally high-rated players
- Chemistry: Rewards for college teammate pairings
- Special Attributes: Preferences for players with Superstar or Hidden designations
- Scheme Fit: Bonuses for players who excel in the selected scheme's required skills
This approach allowed me to mathematically encode qualitative roster-building preferences while maintaining the practical constraints of NFL roster construction. The results provided fascinating insights into how different weighting schemes lead to drastically different optimal rosters.
Results & Visualizations
Optimization Dashboard
Primary interface showing roster composition and optimization parameters.
Scheme Optimization
Comparison of roster optimization results across different offensive schemes.
Scheme Definitions
Madden's position-specific scheme requirements and skill priorities.
Roster Analysis
Detailed breakdown of optimized roster performance metrics and salary allocation.
Future Improvements & Extensions
While this project provides valuable insights into NFL roster optimization, several opportunities for enhancement remain:
- Dynamic Weight Calibration: Refining the penalty and bonus weights based on real-world roster construction outcomes
- Multi-Year Optimization: Extending the model to account for contract structures, rookie development, and future salary cap implications
- Advanced Metrics Integration: Incorporating additional performance metrics beyond Madden ratings, such as advanced analytics from PFF or Next Gen Stats
- Draft Strategy Module: Creating a complementary tool to optimize draft selection strategies based on roster needs and value projections
- Player Development Modeling: Adding projected player development curves to optimize for both current performance and future potential
These enhancements would bring the optimization model closer to the nuanced reality of NFL front office decision-making.
Project Resources
Interested in more projects?
Check out my other optimization and sports analytics work
View Portfolio